Analyze
Plant performance
Plant kW/TR now
1.10
target 0.85
Best chiller
CH-4
0.68 kW/TR @ 70% load
Worst chiller
CH-3
1.50 kW/TR · +76% vs comm.
ΔT 24 h avg
4.5 °C
design 6.0
Ton-hours today
9,840
vs 10,740 yesterday
Sequencing score
71 /100
4 wrong-stage days this week
Range
Plant efficiency — 7 dkW/TR
Header ΔT — 7 d°C
Chiller scoreboard — live vs commissioningclick a row → asset detail
| Chiller | Status | Load | kW | kW/TR | COP | ΔT evap | Cond. approach | vs commissioning | Run hrs | Starts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CH-1 300 TR | RUN | 78% | 211 | 0.90 | 4.0 | 4.6 °C | 1.6 °C | +10% | 41,210 | 5,321 |
| CH-2 300 TR | OFF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 39,480 | 5,102 |
| CH-3 300 TR | RUN | 71% | 320 | 1.50 | 2.4 | 4.4 °C | 4.8 °C | +76% | 44,890 | 6,018 |
| CH-4 500 TR | OFF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22,140 | 2,874 |
Part-load efficiency curveskW/TR vs % load · measured 90 d
CH-1CH-2CH-3CH-4Commissioning ref
CH-3 sits 70–80% above its commissioning curve across the whole load range — consistent with condenser fouling (finding F-2607), not a control issue.
Chillers — running status todayhourly · today, fixed
CH-1
CH-2
CH-3
CH-4
RunOffTrip
06:00 trip on CH-3 auto-reset in 18 min. CH-2 covered the 11:00–16:00 lunch peak; CH-4 (most efficient) unused for 21 days — staging-order review is queued as finding F-2555.
Cooling delivered — 7 dton-hours / day